Normalise per group, and make the notification quota subject-based

Following Connor's point that corpus prevalence reflects how much an outlet
publishes rather than what deserves a notification: allocation should track
stated weights, not corpus composition in EITHER direction. Penalising a topic
for being prevalent is a bug; rewarding it would just amplify whoever publishes
most. This rules out the "reserve slots proportional to corpus share" model that
the previous commit's findings were pointing toward.

Two fixes:

1. Normalisation moves from per-block to per-GROUP. Taking the max across blocks
   gives a subject one draw per block, so foreign affairs -- six of 23 blocks --
   beat everything else by having more chances. It held 70% of the digest while
   software-systems, a quarter of the corpus, held none. Collapsing to the group
   before normalising prices that in. Digest conflict share 13 -> 9, space 2 ->
   4, and us-national appears at all.

2. The per-group quota now keys on the INTEREST group for both lanes. Importance
   blocks describe a kind of importance, not a subject, so two stories on one
   subject could each take a slot via different importance blocks -- which is
   what happened: both importance alerts were Middle East, one via
   war-escalation and one via economic-break.

Interest alerts went from five-of-five Middle East to Ohio redistricting,
political theory and tech policy.

Also demoted prerelease/nightly build entries. The first alert software-systems
ever won was "Nvim development (prerelease) build", which matches the block
correctly and is worthless as a notification.

Documented that switching normalizer requires re-tuning [routing] thresholds:
they are in z-score units, and leaving them at 2.0 under "top-anchored"
silences the interest lane entirely.

news/route.py

@@ -98,8 +98,15 @@ def route(
     group_used: dict[str, int] = {}
 
     def group_of(s: ClusterScore, kind: str) -> str:
-        block = s.interest.block if kind == "interest" else s.importance.block
+        """Quota is per SUBJECT, so both lanes share one counter.
-        return groups.get(block, block)
+
+        Importance blocks describe a KIND of importance (war escalation,
+        economic break), not a topic -- so without this, two stories about the
+        same subject could each take a slot by matching different importance
+        blocks, which is exactly what happened: both importance alerts were
+        Middle East, one via war-escalation and one via economic-break.
+        """
+        return groups.get(s.interest.block, s.interest.block)
 
     def group_full(s: ClusterScore, kind: str) -> bool:
         g = group_of(s, kind)

news/score.py

@@ -95,6 +95,13 @@ class ProfileVectors:
                 return float(block.get("weight", 1.0))
         return 1.0
 
+    def group(self, kind: str, block_id: str) -> str:
+        """Quota/normalisation group for a block, defaulting to its own id."""
+        for bid, _, block in self.blocks[kind]:
+            if bid == block_id:
+                return block.get("group", bid)
+        return block_id
+
     def block(self, kind: str, block_id: str) -> dict:
         for bid, _, b in self.blocks[kind]:
             if bid == block_id:
@@ -166,12 +173,32 @@ def score_clusters(
     demote_raw = profile_vectors.raw_matrix("demote", mat)
 
     norm = NORMALIZERS.get(scoring_cfg.get("normalize", "zscore-per-block"), _z)
-    interest_z = {
+
-        b: norm(v) * profile_vectors.weight("interest", b) for b, v in interest_raw.items()
+    def normalise(kind: str, raw: dict[str, np.ndarray]) -> dict[str, np.ndarray]:
-    }
+        """Normalise per GROUP, not per block.
-    importance_z = {
+
-        b: norm(v) * profile_vectors.weight("importance", b) for b, v in importance_raw.items()
+        Taking the max across blocks gives a subject one draw per block, so a
-    }
+        topic split into five blocks beats one covered by a single block purely
+        by having more chances. Measured: this reader has six foreign-affairs
+        blocks out of 23, and foreign affairs took 70% of the digest while
+        software-systems -- a quarter of the corpus -- took none.
+
+        Collapsing to the group first, THEN normalising, prices that in: the
+        group's distribution already reflects being a max over its members, so
+        normalisation removes the inflation instead of rewarding it.
+        """
+        by_group: dict[str, np.ndarray] = {}
+        for block_id, values in raw.items():
+            g = profile_vectors.group(kind, block_id)
+            by_group[g] = values if g not in by_group else np.maximum(by_group[g], values)
+        weights = {}
+        for block_id in raw:
+            g = profile_vectors.group(kind, block_id)
+            weights[g] = max(weights.get(g, 0.0), profile_vectors.weight(kind, block_id))
+        return {g: norm(v) * weights[g] for g, v in by_group.items()}
+
+    interest_z = normalise("interest", interest_raw)
+    importance_z = normalise("importance", importance_raw)
     # Veto stays on z-scores: it is a comparison against the interest signal,
     # and both sides must be on the same scale.
     veto_z = {b: norm(v) for b, v in veto_raw.items()}
@@ -180,9 +207,15 @@ def score_clusters(
         return max(((b, float(v[i])) for b, v in per_block.items()), key=lambda kv: kv[1])
 
     out: list[ClusterScore] = []
+    def best_block_in(kind: str, group: str, raw: dict[str, np.ndarray], i: int) -> str:
+        members = [b for b in raw if profile_vectors.group(kind, b) == group]
+        return max(members, key=lambda b: float(raw[b][i])) if members else group
+
     for i, row in enumerate(rows):
-        i_block, i_z = argbest(interest_z, i)
+        i_group, i_z = argbest(interest_z, i)
-        m_block, m_z = argbest(importance_z, i)
+        m_group, m_z = argbest(importance_z, i)
+        i_block = best_block_in("interest", i_group, interest_raw, i)
+        m_block = best_block_in("importance", m_group, importance_raw, i)
 
         # --- veto: absolute similarity OR a margin over the interest signal ---
         veto_hit = None

profile/config.toml

@@ -50,6 +50,15 @@ syndication_threshold = 0.97
 # Compare blocks by z-score WITHIN each block, never by raw cosine: cosine
 # magnitude is not comparable across blocks, and a plain max let one block win
 # 78% of all items. See CALIBRATION.md.
+# "zscore-per-block" or "top-anchored". Both normalise per GROUP (see `group`
+# in profile.toml), not per block: taking the max across blocks gives a subject
+# one draw per block, so a topic split into five blocks beats one covered by a
+# single block purely by having more chances.
+#
+# NOTE the thresholds in [routing] are in z-score units. "top-anchored" puts
+# scores on a different scale (1.0 = that group's 99th percentile), so switching
+# normalizer REQUIRES re-tuning them -- verified: leaving them at 2.0 silences
+# the interest lane completely.
 normalize = "zscore-per-block"
 
 # Veto is not a plain similarity threshold. A story can be genuinely adjacent to

profile/profile.toml

@@ -369,6 +369,17 @@ probes = [
   "This week in review: the stories we covered, collected.",
 ]
 
+# Release feeds publish nightly and prerelease builds continuously. They match
+# software-systems correctly and are worthless as notifications -- the first
+# alert this block ever won was "Nvim development (prerelease) build".
+[[demote]]
+id = "prerelease-build"
+penalty = 1.5
+probes = [
+  "Nightly development prerelease build, automatically generated from the main branch.",
+  "Release candidate rc1: pre-release for testing, not recommended for production.",
+]
+
 # ============================================= the importance lane ===========
 # Independent of interest. Vetoes still apply here -- v0.2's bypass lane ignored
 # relevance entirely (gate.rs:302), which let blocklisted items fire at priority 5.